<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Notes Log &#187; rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noteslog.com/tag/rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noteslog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Never change something that works</title>
		<link>http://noteslog.com/post/never-change-something-that-works/</link>
		<comments>http://noteslog.com/post/never-change-something-that-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Ercolino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noteslog.com/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my job I often face this situation. Something goes wrong in a web application, so an issue is reported, an I&#8217;m given the task to fix it. While debugging, I discover many other bugs and fix them as well. Sometimes a fix of mine breaks the application elsewhere, far away from where the original [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my job I often face this situation.</p>
<p>Something goes wrong in a web application, so an issue is reported, an I&#8217;m given the task to fix it.<br />
While debugging, I discover many other bugs and fix them as well.</p>
<p><span id="more-372"></span>Sometimes a fix of mine breaks the application elsewhere, far away from where the original issue was detected.<br />
This is quite a common problem for me, and I think for developers at large too. Nonetheless, when it happens my boss reminds me that say: Never change something that works. I don&#8217;t share this point of view.</p>
<ol>
<li>A bug is to an application, what a mine is to a field.</li>
<li>A buggy application is like a mined field.</li>
<li>Running a buggy application is like walking on a mined field.</li>
<li>A test-passed functionality is like a marked path.</li>
</ol>
<p>You can safely walk on marked paths. Anyway, as soon as you leave them, you start marking a new path. Not blowing up is only a matter of luck. And, blowing or not blowing up on any new path doesn&#8217;t tell anything about the rest of the field. That&#8217;s why application testing is a requirement, but exhaustiveness is just a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(mythology)" target="_blank">Chimera</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://noteslog.com/post/never-change-something-that-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

